|
SEPTEMBER 14, 2006: THE SCARBOROUGH MIRROR
Feuding neighbours even fight over fences DAVID NICKLE Flying
rats, strange men on rooftops and unwanted home repairs were just a few of the
many faces of failed neighbourliness that showed up
at Wednesday's Scarborough Community Council meeting. In their last
meeting before the election, Scarborough's 10 councillors
took what turned into several hours of their packed-full agenda of local
planning items, to deal with three requests from homeowners so fed up with their
neighbours that they felt their only solution was to
put up fences higher than city bylaws permit. Councillors
listened agape to deputations that seemed a primer in how not to deal with
next-door neighbours. First up was
Rosanna Jardine, who described an escalating feud
with her neighbour and former landlady Lila Mak.
Jardine, who was defending a 1.4-metre tall fence in
her front yard, and a 2.2 metre fence in her rear
yard said that she had erected the fences "due to constant harassment"
by Mak - harassment, she said, that included tossing
leaves and debris over the fence, trespassing to damage a shrub on her side of
the fence, and at one point, tossing a dead rat on her steps. Jardine
even provided a videotape, showing her neighbour and
former friend getting out of a school bus she was driving, tossing leaves over
the fence and walking onto her property to fool with a shrub. "It is
unfortunate this matter has come this far but Ms. Mak's
complaint has nothing to do with the fence but who is living on the other side
of the fence," said Jardine. Mak,
for her part, did not deny her neighbour's
allegations - but she claimed that while she had no videotaped proof, she was
simply giving as good as she got. "She was in
my driveway so many times I don't have time to take pictures," said Mak,
who also said that she threw leaves over the fence because they came from a tree
on Jardine's property. And she said that while she
did throw a dead rat onto her neighbour's property,
it was only because Jardine had done so first. "I admit that
I'm wrong - I'm not here for right or wrong, I'm here for the height of the
fence," she said. In the end, the
community council sided with Mak's complaint, and
ordered Jardine to make her fence comply with the
bylaw. Next up were Pam Festin
and Elena Sipen, who together owned a house on They accused Markel
of cutting down a tree on their property, allowing his sons to skateboard on
their property - and they accused The two neighbours
were there to defend themselves. The community
council finally approved in part the elaborate fencing that the two women
requested, although they ordered that fencing that would cross a driveway be
chain link rather than solid for traffic safety purposes. Finally, the
community council heard from Gwen Morgan, who was there to defend a somewhat
larger fence extension to her south She and her
husband had erected a 1.3 metre laticework
on top of the existing 1.5 metre wooden fence. The reason? A neighbour
who constructed a deck on top of his rear yard garage. "He uses his
garage like a deck and is up on the second storey and looks over," she
said. "I have had issues with this man for years... I did plant trees over
there and three of the trees died. My husband put up a screen, and I do feel
better with the screen up." The community
council went along with most of the request, asking her simply to take down one
small section. All three matters,
however, raised the question about whether good fences really do make good neighbours.
Ward 39 Councillor
Mike Del Grande (Scarborough-Agincourt) said that the city shouldn't be using
fences to deal with matters that are more properly before the courts. Ward 37 Councillor
Michael Thompson (Scarborough Centre) had less problem
with using the bylaw on that way. "It's very
important we err on the side of caution - we need to make sure there is a
protective barrier there," said Thompson, who related a story of a family
member assaulted by a harassing neighbour. |