There's a reason to question Mayor Miller's appointment of the new -- and
solid -- city manager
Mayor David Miller was at his Barack Obama best as he endeavoured to justify
the appointment of Joe Pennachetti as the new city manager at council last
week.
"We should be honoured that he is prepared to accept this position ...
we are lucky that Joe is prepared to commit," preached His Blondness, as
if his so-called carefully considered decision was akin to the second coming
of Christ.
"Mr. Pennachetti is uniquely qualified ... there is no one else ...
there is no one else ... Mr. Pennachetti is unique."
Now this has absolutely nothing to do with Pennachetti, who will replace
outgoing Shirley Hoy for the $311,000 job when she leaves the city on Oct. 6
-- or whether his credentials are unique, or not.
I have always found the deputy city manager and chief financial officer
(CFO) immensely approachable, conscientious and thoughtful. He earned
tremendous kudos when he faced angry citizens over the impending land transfer
and personal vehicle taxes at public hearings last June, while Miller and his
cowardly cronies ran for cover (as is their wont).
That said, let's cut to the chase.
This appointment is not about a "seamless transition" to ensure
the "relentless implementation" of a "very ambitious public
policy agenda," as King David so arrogantly claimed. (The only thing
relentless or ambitious, in my view, about Miller's agenda is how out of touch
his regime is with ordinary taxpayers and how much money the socialists spend
on nonsense.)
It has nothing to do either, as Miller contended, with sending a
"powerful signal" to the public service that they can advance within
the city bureaucracy. (Given the number of senior bureaucrats that have left
the city as of late -- and the number grows every day -- the only signal it
sends is "you'd better play the game the mayor's way or look for the
doorway.")
Besides, the mayor's lapdogs like Gloria Lindsay Luby and Howard Moscoe
only make themselves appear ever more foolish and irrelevant when they make
such ridiculous claims -- as they did -- about a proper executive search for
the job costing oodles of money or being a "ruse" because in years
gone by the Mel Lastman regime held a competition and then selected who he
wanted anyway.
"You are dripping with hypocrisy," Moscoe, himself the Master of
Selective Spin, told opponents of the process.
As Doug Holyday quite rightly pointed out, Lastman consistently struck
sub-committees of councillors from every political stripe to select the city's
senior bureaucrats, including Hoy.
As he also noted, he and other members of that committee made
recommendations back to council.
"It was a very inclusive process," Holyday said, adding quite
rightly that for the top municipal job in Canada it would have been far
healthier to see what kind of interesting people would come forward in an open
competition.
So if one reads between the lines, this appointment (and the lack of a fair
competition process) is all about further consolidating Miller's already
iron-clad grip on the city bureaucracy and completely blurring the lines
between what is supposed to be an objective administration and their political
masters.
NO WAVES
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure out Pennachetti knows
which side his bread is buttered on and will not make waves, that however
competent, he will be from this day forward, the "mayor's man."
As Denzil Minnan-Wong told council, there will always be a perception now
that the new city manager is the "mayor's person" and council won't
get the "dispassionate, independent advice" they should get.
Added Mike Del Grande: "This will have a ripple effect in the whole
system (bureaucracy) ... people (civil servants) will think it's fixed and
will be afraid now to say what's on their minds."